BBC Journalists Have Been Told To Stop Saying "BBC Understands" Because It's "Slightly Pompous"

Ok, so if you’re a fan of BBC News you’ve probably noticed a phrase that pops up in their stories and headlines all the bloody time: “BBC understands…”

See “BBC understands” is a way for BBC reporters and editors to tell the reader, “Hey there reader, look, we’ve not confirmed this story on the record…. but, we’re confident it’s true because our sources told us… but also we can’t tell you who the source is. Trust us.”

Yes, BuzzFeed News has also used the phrase “understands”.

It can also leave readers a little perplexed. Like a guy named Angelo from Singapore who wondered aloud on Quora earlier this year.

Helpfully, David Waddell from BBC gave this simple definition:

The ‘BBC understands’ refers to something BBC journalists have learned through their own endeavours. Not information in the public domain, not information gathered by our main news agencies (namely the Press Association, Reuters and Agence France Press) and typically news that we are reporting ahead of our competitors.

And YES, I know, I know, I know, this is hardly the most pressing issue in global media at the moment. But people really notice it.

It also happens to be a running joke among those in the British media. Journalists often accuse the corporation of using the phrase “BBC understands” in relation to stories reported by other outlets, which the BBC has then confirmed with its sources.

In fact, last week I called out a BBC reporter for using the phrase in relation to a fact that had previously been reported by BuzzFeed News.

Obviously, we can’t confirm if this was the tweet that broke the camel’s back… but… BuzzFeed News understands a little over an hour later, BBC executive Gavin Allen emailed his management team telling them to stop using the phrase “BBC understands”.

In the email, Allen called the phrase a “slightly pompous distancing phrase”:

From: Gavin Allen

Date: 4 January 2019 at 17:25:37

To: [redacted]

Subject: “The BBC Understands…”

I can’t ever really see a reason to use this phrase: either it’s true and we know it in which case just report the story, or we’re unsure in which case don’t report it until we are.

It’s also a slightly pompous distancing phrase as if the BBC is somehow different from us.

Gavin Allen
Head of BBC News Output

The BBC wouldn’t comment any further on the policy change.

But there you go! The BBC will no longer be ~understanding~ in their news stories. Now here’s a happy looking dog.

giphy.com

Source link

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *